The One Law:
asdfdsfa
The connection to Ideas:
asdfdsfa
The connection to CHANGE:
asdfdsfa
The connection to CHANGE of CHANGE:
asdfdsfa
The connection to Outlining Boundaries
SHOW THE DIAGRAM OF THE MOLECULE IN A SANDBOX and its relationship to a greater SANDBOX to establish a connection between V4 MV Outlines and any Mathemetical Equation, anything described by the law of symmetry and its symbol the (=) sign.
Parts of the Law:
Without imposing our own Outlines of the different Fields and boundaries for these fields in the Creation MV, we can all agree that this structure would outline ALL THE FIELDS, and their Subfields etc....ACCURATELY and COMPLETELY, which would include any that we may not know about yet, AND a special field related to how these fields and subfields are linked to each other.
If the formulas for each field and subfields...and the field that links them all together is the CERTAIN EQUATION/LAW that describes any/all change and the Changes in said Change, like why planets orbit the way they do and what happens if another mass enters the picture, and so on, then we can say that "THE TRUTH" we started at, which led us to IDEAS and then LAWS, is the UNIST/BELIEF SYSTEM that ALIGNS with the HOLY version of the ONE-LAW.
The Holy version here is actually not necessary to state because it's not the words that we believe in but their moral essence or the spiritual pattern of connections behind them that we accept/consume/eat in the BELIEF's MV. But just in case, we can say the HOLY ONE to separate it from any "form or format" pointing to it.
Also you should be aware that there CANNOT BE two Holy versions because that would mean there are two Completely Accurate and Accurately Complete Legal Frameworks governing reality. And if you recall the prayer section we describe these concepts and what they mean, especially with respect to the concept of Uniqueness then you would know that all that means is that they are the same Holy Law that we're looking at from different angles. Because what Identifies this law to our Human Mind's Belief MV is the 100% Certainty of its answers. In other words, the Defining Principle of the Holy One-Law is exactly that, nothing else. We don't have any other means or criteria to "judge" and identify the Holy One-Law except the 100% Certainty implied in its composition.
Now whether or not we can "Image" this Law so we can "go by it" (rely on it, count on it) as the REAL CREATOR would expect and advise his Chosen Ones to do is another matter we haven't discussed yet. A matter that I will prove to be a Certain Positive , at least the parts we would be more interested in without losing our "potential for growth" necessary for our survival in any domain, living or after/before living. But that's far down the line. This part is only asserting that Everyone Believes in a Holy One-Law. The only "questionable" beliefs arise in the rest of the departments related to it.
Pivoting for Unification's sake:
If you don't want to believe in the "wholesome Law" theory at this point of the proof, then you can simply think of it as the Combined set of all "Non-Wholesome Laws" of reality. That is to say whatever you are willing to accept as "real/true" laws are included in this set, along with all other laws necessary or you would agree to be necessary in the governance of creation that shapes the worldview that you would classify as "The real One".
So it's basically the same as asking the Wholesome One Law for the answers. Except instead of calculating the answer from a single unified Formula Structure, it searches for the specific formula/equation/scientific law that pertains to what you're asking. So if it's a gravity based problem you're solving, then it would simply pull up the General Relativity formula or the E = mc squared for the questions related to energy and mass, and so on.
That means that you don't , or Can't, disagree or dismiss the "existence" (as you might put it) of the concept that this idea is describing. You can only disagree, at this point at least, that it isn't a "Wholesome" structure but a group of separate unrelated or semi-related substructures that we're combining for our own purposes. Either way, it's the version of the Law that all of our Ideas would align with, if we were to consider them CERTAINTIES (or Not RELATIVELY TRUE). Of course this satisfies even the "relative truths" perspectives, since this Certainty is achieved "relative" to this ONE-LAW system we identified here. So, regardless of what or how everyone believes it is, it's simply the "thing or version of the Law(s)" that always yields CERTAIN ANSWERS (Flawless, no errors) in its predictions.